Louisiana House Bill HB745

Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/4/16
• Refer: 3/4/16
• Refer: 3/14/16

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the matter of "Samuel D. Weaver and Susan Weaver, Individually and on Behalf of Minor Children, Samantha and Luke Weaver v. State of Louisiana through the DOTD"

Impact

The passage of HB 745 allows the state to fulfill its legal obligations as determined by the court, thereby ensuring that the compensatory damages awarded in the lawsuit are paid promptly. This measure is important not only for complying with judicial mandates but also for maintaining public trust in the state's commitment to uphold the law and provide justice for its citizens. It reiterates the necessity for adequate funding mechanisms to address similar legal settlements that may arise in the future.

Summary

House Bill 745 appropriates funds for the payment of a consent judgment resulting from a lawsuit involving Samuel D. Weaver and Susan Weaver, who are seeking compensation on behalf of their minor children. The bill specifies that a total of $240,000 will be allocated from Louisiana's General Fund for the fiscal year 2016-2017 to satisfy this court-ordered financial obligation. This appropriation is designated for the payment to the Weavers in the case against the State of Louisiana through the Department of Transportation and Development.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be procedural, with a general consensus that fulfilling court judgments is necessary and proper. There is little evident contention in the discussions surrounding this bill, as it deals with a predetermined legal obligation and the straightforward appropriation of funds.

Contention

While there is no significant contention apparent in the summary of discussions surrounding HB 745, it is crucial to recognize that appropriating funds for legal settlements can sometimes lead to debates over budgetary priorities. The necessity to direct public funds toward legal liabilities might be scrutinized in broader fiscal discussions, particularly concerning how such allocations affect other areas of public finance.