Louisiana House Bill HB743

Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/4/16
• Refer: 3/4/16
• Refer: 3/14/16
• Report Pass: 3/21/16
• Engrossed: 3/30/16
• Refer: 3/31/16

Caption

Provides for a subcommittee of the Joint Legislative Committee on the Budget to conduct sunset reviews of state departments (RE SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)

Impact

The introduction of this bill represents a significant change to how state departments are managed and scrutinized. The review subcommittee will have the authority to conduct a comprehensive sunset review, requiring state agencies to justify their existence and operations regularly. If an agency is not found to be effectively serving its purpose, it may be terminated. This change aims to foster a culture of transparency and efficiency within government entities, which could alter the operational landscape of state departments considerably. Furthermore, the bill provides for a process whereby unfunded programs may be reviewed and potentially eliminated, streamlining fiscal responsibilities for the state.

Summary

House Bill 743 establishes the statutory entity review subcommittee within the Joint Legislative Committee on the Budget (JLCB) to facilitate the evaluation and review of various state departments under the provisions of the Sunset Law. This bill aims to streamline the process by which state agencies are evaluated for their continued necessity and efficiency, potentially leading to the termination of entities that do not deliver effective services or have become obsolete. By doing so, the bill seeks to promote accountability and enhance the function of state government, ultimately serving the interests of taxpayers.

Sentiment

Discussions surrounding HB 743 reflect a generally positive sentiment towards its objectives. Supporters argue it is a step towards better governance and fiscal responsibility, ensuring that public funds are utilized effectively and efficiently. They believe that such a review of agencies is long overdue and will prevent wasteful spending on inactive or ineffective programs. However, there is also concern among some legislators and interest groups about the implications this may have on specific programs that serve vital functions in the community. Critics worry that essential services might be cut in the name of efficiency without proper consideration of their community value.

Contention

While many support the intent behind HB 743, notable contention arises regarding the potential impacts of mandatory program evaluations. Some legislators fear that the process might lead to the unjustified termination of programs that are deemed less essential in a purely fiscal sense but which provide critical support to the community. There is apprehension that such evaluations may overlook qualitative factors, leading to cuts that could harm vulnerable populations. The bill also raises questions about which programs truly require oversight and at what frequency these evaluations should occur, indicating a need for careful implementation to balance efficiency with community needs.