Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claim Against The State Of Neva Pasculano.
Impact
The impact of HJ00070 on state laws revolves around the authority of the Claims Commissioner in evaluating and adjudicating financial claims made against the state. By confirming the dismissal of Pasculano's claim, this resolution reinforces the procedural outcomes of claims adjudicated by the commissioner, establishing a precedent that may affect future claims against the state. It underscores the capacity of the Claims Commissioner to determine the validity of claims before they escalate to higher judicial review.
Summary
House Joint Resolution No. 70, introduced during the January session of 2017, confirms the decision made by the Claims Commissioner regarding a specific claim against the state. This resolution upholds the dismissal of a claim filed by Neva Pasculano, which exceeded twenty thousand dollars. The legislative intent behind this resolution is to formally recognize the judgment of the Claims Commissioner and affirm the state's position on this matter without further dispute.
Contention
Notable points of contention surrounding HJ00070 may involve interpretations of the Claims Commissioner's powers and the reasons behind the dismissal of Pasculano's claim. While the bill maintains that the commissioner's decision is upheld, there could be debate among legislators regarding the adequacy of the review process in such financial claims. Issues may arise concerning who bears the burden of proof in claims against the state and whether the commissioner's criteria for dismissal adequately protect the interests of individuals making claims.