Urges the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries to provide stricter enforcement of shrimping laws and regulations
If HCR30 is effectively carried out, it would enhance the current regulations surrounding shrimping activities. The resolution specifically emphasizes the need for enforcing compliance with regulations like the use of turtle excluder devices and bycatch reduction devices required for vessels operating in both state and federal waters. Stricter oversight is anticipated to positively impact the health of the shrimp populations and contribute to the overall stability of Louisiana's fishing economy, which is heavily reliant on this resource. Moreover, it aims to bolster regulatory assurance that existing laws are having the intended effect on marine wildlife conservation.
House Concurrent Resolution 30 (HCR30) urges the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries in Louisiana to implement stricter enforcement of existing shrimping laws and regulations. The resolution acknowledges the economic significance of the commercial shrimp fishery in Louisiana, which is the largest fishery in the state. In 2011, Louisiana's white shrimp landings were nearly twenty-six thousand metric tons, equating to over fifty-seven million pounds, while brown shrimp landings were around eighteen thousand metric tons or over thirty-nine million pounds. Increased enforcement is seen as essential to ensure the sustainability and viability of the shrimp fishery, as well as to protect those working within the industry.
The sentiment surrounding HCR30 appears to be overwhelmingly positive, particularly among those invested in the fishing industry and conservation efforts. The resolution received unanimous support during the Senate Vote on May 3, 2016, indicating strong bipartisan recognition of the importance of protecting shrimping activities and the economic benefits they yield to the state. Stakeholders likely view stricter enforcement as a necessary step toward maintaining a sustainable fishery, alleviating concerns about overfishing and safeguarding the livelihoods of individuals within the industry.
While the resolution received unanimous support, potential points of contention could arise from differing viewpoints on how to balance enforcement with the interests of local fishermen and their livelihoods. Some stakeholders may worry about the economic impact of stricter regulations on shrimping operations, particularly small-scale fishers who might face additional burdens. Additionally, discussions may emerge regarding how strictly the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries will implement these enforcement measures, including potential implications for those who do not comply with shrimping regulations in the future.