Louisiana House Bill HB926

Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/28/16
• Refer: 3/29/16
• Report Pass: 4/7/16
• Engrossed: 4/18/16
• Refer: 4/19/16

Caption

Amends penalties for distribution of heroin that contains fetanyl or any derivative thereof

Impact

The introduction of HB926 is expected to have a substantial impact on state laws concerning drug offenses. By instituting stricter penalties for offenses involving heroin combined with fentanyl, the bill aims to address the escalating opioid crisis and the dangers presented by fentanyl, which is noted for its potency. Supporters argue that these harsher penalties are necessary to deter drug trafficking and reduce the associated public health risks, while opponents may argue this approach could contribute to overcrowding in prisons and fails to address the root causes of substance abuse.

Summary

House Bill 926, presented by Representative Dwight, amends the penalties related to the distribution of heroin, specifically when combined with fentanyl or its analogues. The bill modifies existing penalties under the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Law, significantly increasing the severity of punishments for individuals convicted of offenses involving heroin mixed with fentanyl. Under the new provisions, first-time offenders would face a mandatory minimum of twenty years of hard labor without parole, while repeat offenders could receive sentences of thirty to ninety-nine years in prison, also without the possibility of parole.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be largely supportive among proponents who view it as a crucial step in combating drug-related violence and addiction. Legislative discussions indicate a consensus that harsher penalties could potentially diminish the trafficking of heroin laced with fentanyl. However, there remains a faction that expresses concern over the effectiveness of punitive measures, advocating for comprehensive treatment solutions instead of increased incarceration. Thus, while the proposed law garners support for its intent, it also faces criticism regarding its long-term implications on individuals and the justice system as a whole.

Contention

Notable points of contention include discussions about whether stringent sentencing is the most effective means of addressing the opioid epidemic. Critics suggest that focusing solely on punitive measures does not take into consideration the complexities of drug addiction and the socioeconomic issues that often accompany it. Additionally, there are debates regarding the potential increase in prison populations and the financial burden this may impose on the state's correctional facilities.