Louisiana House Bill HCR67

Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/12/16
• Refer: 4/13/16
• Report Pass: 4/20/16
• Engrossed: 4/25/16
• Refer: 4/26/16
• Report Pass: 6/1/16
• Passed: 6/6/16

Caption

Requests the Department of State Civil Service to review the span of control of supervisors in state government and to report to specified legislative committees no later than August 15, 2016

Impact

The impact of HCR67 centers around enhancing operational efficiency in state government by scrutinizing the supervisory structure. The resolution is particularly pertinent given previous reports by the legislative auditor, which highlighted that a significant percentage of state supervisors oversee only one staff member. This situation raises questions about the appropriateness and effectiveness of such management models in various state operations.

Summary

HCR67, submitted by Representatives Mike Johnson and Senator Peacock, urges the Department of State Civil Service to conduct a review of the span of control of supervisors within state government. The resolution emphasizes the need for this examination amid ongoing budget challenges, aiming to ensure that state operations are as efficient and effective as possible. The bill specifically requests findings and recommendations to be reported to the House and Senate governmental affairs committees and the Joint Legislative Committee on the Budget by November 15, 2016.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the resolution appears to be favorable among legislators who are supportive of ensuring effective management practices in state government. The acknowledgment of budget constraints adds urgency to the call for a review, indicating a shared understanding of the necessity to optimize resources. However, while the bill is intended to enhance operational efficiency, there may be concerns from employees regarding job security and the implications of possible restructuring that the review might suggest.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential for changes in supervisory roles and how such adjustments could disrupt current operational dynamics within state agencies. Critics of managerial reviews sometimes express apprehension that an overemphasis on efficiency might lead to underappreciation of the unique needs of smaller offices, where the one-to-one supervisory ratio might be more justified. The resolution invites a detailed examination of these exceptions, calling for thoughtful consideration of when certain supervisory arrangements are appropriate.