Requires reporting of certain information concerning persons with a felony conviction who are released from the custody or supervision of the Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX See Note)
Impact
The impact of HB 168 on state laws includes the formalization of the process by which felony convictions are reported and monitored in relation to voting eligibility. The bill organizes the reporting into an ongoing procedure with deadlines, requiring the Department of Public Safety and Corrections to file supplemental reports quarterly. This aims to improve the oversight concerning voting rights for those with felony convictions, particularly focusing on individuals who have been released and may be eligible for first offender pardons.
Summary
House Bill 168 aims to modify the reporting requirements related to individuals with felony convictions who are under the custody or supervision of the Department of Public Safety and Corrections in Louisiana. The legislation mandates that the department must report detailed information, including names, birth dates, sex, and addresses of these individuals, to the Department of State. This report is intended to ensure that the voting databases remain current and accurate, especially when it comes to the rights of these individuals to vote after completing their sentences.
Sentiment
Discussions surrounding the bill reflect a positive sentiment towards enhancing the accountability and transparency of voter registration related to individuals with felony convictions. Supporters believe that more rigorous reporting requirements will support the fair treatment and reintegration of formerly incarcerated individuals into society, particularly in the context of restoring voting rights. However, there may be concerns about the implications this bill can have on the administrative burden for the Department of Public Safety.
Contention
A point of contention within the discussions of HB 168 could arise from the balance between ensuring proper oversight for voter registration and potential privacy concerns for individuals with felony convictions. Critics may argue that increased reporting could lead to stigmatization or discrimination against this population. Additionally, there may be debates over the adequacy of providing information concerning individuals who are eligible for pardons, and how this could affect their reintegration into the community.
Restoring the right to vote to certain persons barred from voting as a result of a felony conviction, changing the information required on voter registration forms, and changing voting procedure for certain persons who are convicted of felonies. (FE)