Louisiana Senate Bill SB147

Louisiana 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/31/17
• Refer: 3/31/17
• Refer: 4/10/17
• Report Pass: 4/18/17
• Engrossed: 4/25/17
• Refer: 4/26/17
• Report Pass: 5/18/17
• Enrolled: 6/2/17
• Chaptered: 6/8/17
• Passed: 6/8/17

Caption

Provides relative to the Louisiana National Guard. (gov sig)

Impact

The impact of SB 147 is significant as it reinforces the authority of the Military Department in managing its operational and disciplinary affairs. By streamlining processes related to court-martial jurisdiction and establishing clear definitions and procedures for disciplinary actions, the bill aims to provide service members with fair treatment while maintaining the efficiency and effectiveness of military law. The amendments would also affect how military personnel are tried for offenses committed both within and outside the state.

Summary

Senate Bill 147 proposes amendments to existing laws relating to the regulation of the Louisiana Military Department and the procedures for courts-martial. Key provisions of the bill include clarifications regarding the jurisdiction of courts-martial, processes for disciplinary hearings, and exceptions for military personnel under specific circumstances. These changes are intended to enhance the operational effectiveness of the state's military forces and ensure that disciplinary actions align with both state and federal standards.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 147 appears generally supportive among legislative members, particularly those aligned with military interests. Many legislators recognize the necessity of updating military code to reflect contemporary needs and provide better legal frameworks for active duty personnel. However, there are concerns regarding ensuring that the rights of service members are protected under these revised regulations, which could lead to debates on the balance between military discipline and individual rights.

Contention

Notable points of contention involve the interpretation of jurisdictional authority and the procedures for handling disciplinary matters. Some critics express apprehension that modifications to court-martial procedures may lack adequate safeguards for service members' rights. Furthermore, discussions highlight the potential discrepancy in how disciplinary actions might be perceived by service members, with calls for assurance that fairness and justice are integral components of any amendments to military law.