Louisiana House Bill HB561

Louisiana 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/31/17
• Refer: 3/31/17
• Refer: 4/10/17

Caption

Levies a 1/2 cent state sales and use tax and dedicates the proceeds to the 21st Century Transportation and Infrastructure Fund (OR +$428,000,000 SD RV See Note)

Impact

The bill is expected to have significant implications for state funding, particularly in relation to infrastructure development and maintenance. By earmarking these tax proceeds specifically for the 21st Century Transportation and Infrastructure Fund, HB 561 aims to enhance the financial resources available for transportation projects, which may alleviate congestion, improve road conditions, and facilitate economic growth. The new tax will supplement existing sales taxes already imposed on consumers, raising concerns about the cumulative tax burden on individuals and businesses.

Summary

House Bill 561 proposes the imposition of an additional 0.5% state sales and use tax, to be effective from July 1, 2018, until June 30, 2038. The tax is levied on retail sales, consumption, distribution, and storage of tangible personal property in Louisiana. The revenues generated from this tax will be directed to the 21st Century Transportation and Infrastructure Fund to support transportation projects and infrastructure improvements across the state. This measure is intended to address ongoing funding challenges faced in the state’s transportation sector.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 561 appears mixed, reflecting both support and opposition among lawmakers and constituents. Proponents argue that the additional funding is crucial for advancing necessary infrastructure projects that have long been neglected and that it will ultimately benefit the economy by improving transportation systems. Detractors, however, emphasize the need for fiscal responsibility and express concerns about the impact of increasing taxes on households and local businesses, especially in the face of existing tax pressures.

Contention

Key points of contention include discussions on the anticipated effectiveness of the tax in yielding significant improvements in infrastructure compared to the potential negative effects on consumers and businesses. While supporters highlight the critical nature of funding for infrastructure, critics question whether a reliance on additional sales tax is a sustainable and equitable solution. Additionally, concerns regarding accountability and the proper use of the dedicated funds have been raised, focusing on ensuring that they are directly funneled into impactful transportation solutions.