Louisiana Senate Bill SB203

Louisiana 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/31/17
• Refer: 3/31/17
• Refer: 4/10/17

Caption

Provides for the reinstatement of the sales and use tax exemption for numismatic coins and bullion. (gov sig)

Impact

The proposed law restores an exemption that is expected to ease the financial burden on investors and collectors by facilitating tax-free purchases of precious metals. This could encourage a more active market for numismatic coins and bullion within Louisiana, likely stimulating local economic activity and benefiting businesses involved in the sale of these commodities. By removing state sales tax, the bill aims to position Louisiana as a more attractive state for investors in tangible assets, aligning with trends in other states that offer similar exemptions.

Summary

Senate Bill 203, introduced by Senator Gary Smith, aims to reinstate the sales and use tax exemption for numismatic coins and precious metals, which includes gold, silver, and platinum bullion. The bill reflects a significant change in state tax policy by eliminating the three percent sales tax that was previously applied to these sales and purchases until July 1, 2018. This reinstatement is positioned to provide tax relief for individuals purchasing precious metals, which are often sought after for investment purposes and as a hedge against inflation.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB 203 appears to be positive among investors and collectors of precious metals, who view the reinstatement of the tax exemption as a necessary and beneficial measure. However, some fiscal conservatives may express concerns about the potential implications for state revenue, considering the impact of exemptions on overall tax collections. The discussion surrounding this bill highlights the tension between promoting individual investment and maintaining sufficient state funding through tax revenues.

Contention

Notable points of contention are likely to arise regarding the fiscal responsibility of the bill, with opponents arguing that reinstating the tax exemption could lead to significant loss of tax revenue for the state. Proponents contend that this measure will ultimately stimulate economic growth that could offset any potential losses. The debate embodies the broader discussions on how tax policy should balance investment incentives against the need for adequate state funding to support public services.