Louisiana House Bill HCR68

Louisiana 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/10/17
• Refer: 5/10/17
• Report Pass: 5/11/17
• Engrossed: 5/23/17
• Refer: 5/24/17
• Report Pass: 5/30/17
• Passed: 6/1/17

Caption

Requests the Department of Agriculture and Forestry to study implementing a master logger certification program under the office of forestry

Impact

If implemented, this program would mandate that all logging contractors and foremen receive training and certification, ensuring they are up-to-date on best practices in forestry management. The resolution highlights the importance of sustainable forestry not only for the ecological balance but also for bolstering the economic viability of the forest products industry, which is a significant source of employment in the state.

Summary

House Concurrent Resolution 68 (HCR68) urges the Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry to study the feasibility of implementing a master logger certification program. The program aims to educate and certify loggers in sustainable forestry practices, which is critical for maintaining the health and productivity of Louisiana's forestlands, which cover approximately 48% of the state’s land area.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR68 appears to be generally positive. Supporters emphasize the importance of sound forestry practices and the educational component of the program, arguing that certified loggers would lead to better forest management and environmental outcomes. Additionally, the initiative is tied to efforts in promoting responsible timber harvesting, which should resonate well with both environmental advocates and industry stakeholders.

Contention

While the resolution garnered unanimous support during voting, potential points of contention might arise during its implementation phase. Questions regarding the effectiveness of the proposed certification classes, the administrative capacity of the Louisiana Forestry Association to manage the program, and the long-term commitment required from loggers to maintain their certification could be areas for discussion. Critics may voice concerns about the cost implications of the training and the potential bureaucratic challenges posed by the additional requirements placed on logging operations.