Louisiana House Bill HR133

Louisiana 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/18/17
• Refer: 5/18/17
• Report Pass: 5/22/17
• Passed: 6/8/17

Caption

Requests the Louisiana Public Service Commission to study the CLEP battery pilot and the feasibility of implementation

Impact

The introduction of HR133 could significantly influence state laws regarding energy consumption and utility regulations. The bill promotes the adoption of energy storage systems, which may lead to a shift in how electricity pricing is structured in Louisiana. By allowing consumers to buy and sell electricity based on real-time wholesale prices, the bill aims to benefit all consumers, not just those opting for the CLEP system. Furthermore, it emphasizes the potential for renewable energy growth and improved energy efficiency across diverse consumer classes, suggesting a long-term transformation of the market.

Summary

HR133 urges the Louisiana Public Service Commission to investigate the feasibility of implementing a Customer Lowered Electricity Price (CLEP) battery pilot program in Louisiana. The CLEP initiative seeks to create an innovative electricity pricing mechanism that operates within a free market framework without resorting to subsidies or taxes. It aims to enhance the reliability and efficiency of electricity consumption for both residential and commercial users by leveraging smart meter technology. In particular, the proposal emphasizes the adoption of whole-home batteries funded by utilities, providing significant advantages in managing energy costs and consumption patterns.

Sentiment

Generally, the sentiment around HR133 appears positive among proponents, who view it as a forward-thinking initiative toward renewable energy and cost-saving strategies. Supporters, including environmental organizations and energy experts, believe that it could serve as a model for modernizing energy usage while maintaining efficiency. However, there may also be concerns about the integration of such a program and its long-term implications on established utility structures and regulatory frameworks.

Contention

One of the notable points of contention surrounding HR133 includes the implementation details and the extent to which it can effectively silence criticisms about potential market imbalances it may cause. Discussions may arise regarding the impact of whole-home battery systems on non-participating consumers and the associated costs for utilities in transitioning toward this new pricing structure. Additionally, questions about long-term sustainability, return on investment for utilities, and the program's dependence on effective participation from consumers remain crucial points of deliberation.