Provides that any reference to an attorney made by a criminal suspect constitutes an invocation of the right to counsel. (8/1/18)
Impact
Should SB39 be enacted, it will modify existing legal standards regarding how invoke the right to counsel is interpreted in Louisiana. This change could ultimately provide greater protections to suspects during interrogations, ensuring that their references to legal representation are recognized as valid requests for counsel, thus potentially altering the dynamics of police interrogations significantly. The provision ensures that law enforcement must halt questioning until an attorney is present or appointed for the suspect, aiming for a more fair judicial process.
Summary
Senate Bill 39 aims to amend Louisiana's Code of Criminal Procedure regarding the right to counsel for individuals who are arrested or detained. Specifically, the bill provides that any mention of 'attorney,' 'lawyer,' or 'counsel' during an interrogation by law enforcement will be interpreted as an invocation of the suspect’s right to have legal assistance. This legislative change is intended to address and overrule a Louisiana Supreme Court decision which concluded that an ambiguous reference to seeking a lawyer did not sufficiently invoke one's right to counsel.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SB39 appears to be strongly supportive among advocates for criminal justice reform. Proponents argue that the bill strengthens protections for individuals, particularly those unable to secure legal representation on their own. On the other hand, some law enforcement and prosecutorial entities may view the bill as an unnecessary impediment to investigations, expressing concerns that it may hinder their ability to gather evidence effectively. Thus, the discussion around this bill highlights a tension between protecting individual rights and the operational needs of law enforcement.
Contention
A central point of contention involves whether the legislative override of judicial interpretation is appropriate. Critics may argue that such a move undermines judicial authority and shifts the balance of power between branches of government. Supporters of the bill counter that clarifying the invocation of counsel is necessary to prevent miscarriages of justice, particularly in vulnerable populations. This debate reflects broader discussions about individual rights versus state interests in law enforcement.
Requires that Miranda rights statements be more specific with respect to the right to counsel; requires inquiry into whether such rights are understood.
Requires proof of identification from parents for an unemancipated minor child to obtain an abortion based upon parental consent and requires court-ordered counseling if it is suspected that the minor is a victim of criminal sexual exploitation. (8/1/17) (RE SEE FISC NOTE LF EX)