Provides relative to the practice of cosmetology. (8/1/18)
The bill's implications are significant as they standardize the training and certification process for natural hair braiders in Louisiana, integrating them under the state board's regulation. By requiring formal education and ongoing continuing education—24 hours annually—SB 370 seeks to ensure that practitioners maintain standards of health and safety in their services. This could potentially enhance the overall quality of cosmetology services provided in the state and increase consumer confidence in natural hair braiding practices.
Senate Bill 370 establishes new regulations for the practice of cosmetology in Louisiana, specifically addressing the area of natural hair braiding. The bill introduces definitions for terms related to cosmetology practices, such as 'natural hair braider' and 'natural hair braiding service'. Importantly, it mandates that individuals must fulfill certain requirements to legally engage in natural hair braiding, which include being at least 16 years old, completing the 10th grade or equivalent education, and undergoing a minimum of 1,000 hours of instruction from an approved training program. Additionally, individuals must pay an applicable fee to obtain their permit for braiding services.
The general sentiment surrounding SB 370 appears to be somewhat mixed. Supporters argue that establishing rigorous standards for natural hair braiding will professionalize the field, thereby benefiting both practitioners and consumers through heightened service quality and professionalism. Critics, however, may see the educational and financial barriers imposed by the bill as unnecessary, potentially limiting entry into the cosmetology field for aspiring natural hair braiders. The debate reflects broader themes regarding regulation in professions that have traditionally been less formalized.
Notable points of contention regarding SB 370 may revolve around the balance between consumer protection and access to the profession. Advocates for regulation emphasize the importance of safety standards and the need for trained professionals in an industry that deals closely with personal grooming and health implications. On the other hand, opponents might raise concerns about the potential for overregulation, arguing that such requirements could dissuade new entrants to the field and limit economic opportunities for individuals looking to start their own hair-braiding business.