Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00689

Introduced
1/28/19  
Introduced
1/28/19  
Refer
1/28/19  
Refer
3/19/19  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Issuance Of Ex Parte Restraining Orders.

Impact

The enactment of SB 689 is expected to have significant implications for state laws regarding the protection of individuals from domestic violence. By streamlining the process for obtaining restraining orders, the bill seeks to provide quicker and more effective legal recourse for those who fear for their safety. This could lead to increased filings for restraining orders, as individuals may feel empowered to seek protection when facing threats. Additionally, the bill's provision for temporary child custody arrangements addresses the needs of families in crisis, providing immediate relief and protection for children involved in domestic disputes.

Summary

Senate Bill 689, also known as the Act Concerning The Issuance of Ex Parte Restraining Orders, aims to enhance the court's ability to issue restraining orders in situations where there is an immediate risk of physical danger to an applicant. It introduces provisions that allow courts to act swiftly to protect individuals who allege imminent threats, enabling temporary measures such as prohibiting the respondent from approaching the applicant or entering their residence. This legislative measure focuses primarily on addressing concerns related to domestic violence and safeguarding vulnerable individuals, particularly in volatile situations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 689 appears largely supportive among lawmakers and advocacy groups focused on domestic violence prevention. Proponents argue that the ability for courts to issue prompt ex parte orders is a critical step in safeguarding victims and preventing further harm. However, there may be concerns about the potential for misuse of such orders, leading to discussions on the need for safeguards to ensure they are issued appropriately and not exploited in custody disputes or other non-violent conflicts.

Contention

Notable points of contention during discussions surrounding the bill included the balance between providing immediate protection and ensuring due process for the respondent. Critics raised concerns about the potential for ex parte orders to be granted based on unverified claims, which may unfairly limit the rights of the respondent without adequate legal recourse. Hence, while the intent of SB 689 is to protect potential victims, ongoing debates highlight the need to establish clear guidelines and oversight to prevent any misuse of the legal provisions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT HB05326

An Act Concerning The Factors That A Court Will Consider When Deciding Whether A Restraining Order Is To Be Extended.

CT SB00123

An Act Concerning Coerced Debt.

CT SB00002

An Act Concerning Artificial Intelligence.

CT HB05419

An Act Concerning The Authority Of The Attorney General To Initiate Legal Actions In Response To Alleged Discriminatory Housing Practices.

CT HB05403

An Act Concerning Military Protection Orders And Other Interpersonal Violence Protections.

CT SB00005

An Act Concerning School Resources.

CT SB00007

An Act Concerning Connecticut Paid Sick Days.

CT SB00004

An Act Concerning Victims Of Domestic Violence, The Unsolicited Transmission Of Intimate Images By Means Of An Electronic Communication Device And The Impermissible Use Of Nondisclosure Agreements In The Workplace.

CT SB00395

An Act Concerning The Reporting Of Medical Debt.

CT SB00003

An Act Concerning Consumer Protection.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.