One of the significant outcomes of AB 85 is that it encourages counties to extend eligibility for general assistance programs specifically to employable veterans. By doing so, the bill imposes a new layer of requirements on counties, potentially changing how they allocate resources and support to local residents. This has implications for welfare management and cooperation between state and local agencies regarding support for veterans.
Summary
Assembly Bill 85, also known as the General Assistance Thank You for Your Service Act of 2017, modifies requirements related to general assistance programs in California, particularly for employable veterans who have been honorably discharged from the United States Armed Forces. The bill exempts these veterans from the previous limitation that restricted employable individuals from receiving general assistance benefits for more than three months within any twelve-month period, unless the county enacts an ordinance to apply this limitation to them. This change aims to provide better support for veterans as they transition to civilian employment and address their particular needs in the welfare system.
Sentiment
Overall, the sentiment around AB 85 has been positive, particularly among veteran advocacy groups and those who support enhancing the social safety net for discharged veterans. However, there are concerns about the additional financial responsibilities placed on local agencies. Advocates argue that this legislation aligns with the moral obligation to support those who have served in the military, while opponents may fear that it could strain limited county resources.
Contention
Notably, some contention has arisen regarding the exemption for employable veterans. Those in favor see it as a necessary accommodation to ensure these individuals receive the support they need to reintegrate into society. In contrast, critics point to the potential burden on localities to enact new ordinances if they choose to apply the same restrictions to veterans as they do to other employable individuals. This reflection reveals a broader debate on how best to deliver assistance while managing county budgets and obligations.