Louisiana Senate Bill SCR80

Louisiana 2018 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/16/18
• Refer: 4/17/18
• Report Pass: 4/23/18
• Refer: 5/8/18

Caption

Requests the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority to conduct a science-based study of the adequacy of the current inland boundary of the coastal zone of Louisiana. (OR INCREASE GF EX See Note)

Impact

The study requested by SCR80 is set to assess whether the current inland boundary meets the coastal management needs of Louisiana's residents and resources. By pushing for this detailed examination, the resolution underscores the importance of coastal zone management not only for environmental stewardship but also for economic viability. It implies that the preservation and restoration of coastal wetlands are crucial, as the costs associated with these actions are projected to be less than those incurred from damage resulting from neglect.

Summary

SCR80 is a Senate Concurrent Resolution that requests the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority of Louisiana to conduct a science-based study of the adequacy of the current inland boundary of the state's coastal zone. This bill emphasizes the significance of the coastal zone for Louisiana's economy and environment, highlighting the need for effective management to address coastal degradation due to climate change, hurricanes, and other factors. The resolution stresses that since the existing boundary has not been scrutinized in nearly a decade, a reevaluation is both necessary and timely.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding SCR80 is positive, reflecting a proactive approach toward safeguarding Louisiana’s coastal resources. However, there may be underlying concerns regarding the potential for legislative action based on the study's findings, especially among stakeholders who may fear bureaucratic overreach or misalignment of management goals. The request for a scientific study suggests a shared commitment to data-driven decision-making, which is typically well-received among environmental advocates and policymakers.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding how the study’s findings are utilized and whether they might lead to changes in existing laws or policies governing the coastal zone. As it addresses significant factors like economic activity, habitat value, and archaeological resources, there could be debates on prioritization among various interests, particularly between economic development and environmental protection. Furthermore, the discussion around potential revisions to the current boundary might provoke scrutiny from both local communities and businesses that depend on coastal resources.