Provides for a procedure to pass over controversial instruments on third reading, to be referred to as the "Berthelot Rule"
Impact
The adoption of HR142 modifies how legislative business is conducted in the Louisiana House of Representatives. By allowing for preferential treatment of noncontroversial bills, the Berthelot Rule seeks to avoid protracted debates on matters that are unlikely to face substantial opposition. This provision could potentially lead to a more effective legislative agenda and a more expedited passage of certain laws, which is viewed favorably by proponents of the rule. However, it may also raise concerns regarding the types of legislation that are classified as noncontroversial, possibly sidelining important but contentious issues.
Summary
House Resolution 142 (HR142), introduced by Representative Lance Harris, establishes a rule known as the 'Berthelot Rule' which permits the House of Representatives to prioritize the consideration of noncontroversial legislative instruments on their third reading. The resolution aims to streamline legislative procedures by allowing the Speaker of the House to bypass certain rules for final consideration of bills deemed as noncontentious. This rule is intended to enhance efficiency in the legislative process and to facilitate smoother passage of less controversial matters during the legislative week.
Sentiment
General sentiment towards HR142 appears to be supportive among those who prioritize efficiency in legislative processes. Supporters argue that it will enable the House to manage its time better and focus on other pressing matters. Conversely, there may be concerns among some legislators regarding the subjective nature of what constitutes a 'noncontroversial' bill, which could lead to potential misuse of the rule to expedite less transparent legislative practices. This ambivalence reflects a broader debate within the legislature about transparency versus efficiency.
Contention
The primary contention surrounding HR142 lies in its implications for legislative transparency and debate. While it is designed to avoid unnecessary deliberation on straightforward bills, some opponents might argue that this approach can undermine the legislative process by marginalizing discussions on important issues. The rule, as adopted, could be seen as a means to streamline operations at the expense of thorough scrutiny, raising important questions about checks and balances within the House of Representatives.
Provides an option in the House Rules to limit the debate on legislative instruments on final passage or adoption by a majority vote of the elected members of the House