California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB563

Introduced
2/14/17  
Refer
2/27/17  
Report Pass
3/13/17  
Refer
3/14/17  
Report Pass
3/22/17  
Refer
3/27/17  
Refer
5/17/17  
Refer
5/17/17  
Report Pass
5/26/17  
Engrossed
5/31/17  
Refer
6/1/17  
Refer
6/1/17  
Refer
6/14/17  
Report Pass
6/21/17  
Refer
6/21/17  
Refer
6/21/17  
Report Pass
6/28/17  
Refer
6/28/17  
Refer
7/10/17  
Refer
7/10/17  
Report Pass
9/1/17  
Report Pass
9/1/17  
Enrolled
9/14/17  
Chaptered
9/28/17  
Chaptered
9/28/17  
Passed
9/28/17  

Caption

CalFresh Employment and Training program.

Impact

The impact of AB 563 is significant as it modifies existing welfare regulations that may lead to increased employment opportunities for participants in California's CalFresh program. With approximately 35 out of 58 counties participating, this bill allows for broader access to E&T services, ultimately facilitating skill improvement and reducing long-term dependency on food assistance. The requirement for counties to adopt specific strategies to utilize CalFresh E&T funds effectively promotes accountability and resource optimization among local agencies.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 563, authored by Assemblymember Arambula, aims to amend the Welfare and Institutions Code specifically in relation to the CalFresh Employment and Training (E&T) program. This bill seeks to enhance support for low-income Californians by prohibiting mandatory placements in the program for able-bodied adults without dependents (ABAWD) who are subject to federal time limits on their CalFresh benefits. The legislation allows counties that opt to participate in the program to offer additional components such as job search training and job retention services, thereby broadening the scope of support available to participants.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 563 appears to be largely positive among supporters, who view it as a proactive measure to assist unemployed and underemployed Californians. They argue that enhancing job training resources aligns with the goals of poverty alleviation, supporting individuals in breaking the cycle of dependency. However, some concerns were raised regarding the implementation logistics and the balance between federal requirements and state flexibility within the program.

Contention

Notable points of contention include debates over the adequacy of funding for the expanded program features and the potential administrative burdens placed on counties. Critics might also argue about the balance of resources amidst other welfare needs. The requirement that regulations be adopted by a specific date (January 1, 2019) underscores the urgency of effective implementation, prompting discussions about the readiness of local agencies to meet these new requirements.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB282

CalFresh and CalWORKs.

CA AB1892

CalFresh.

CA SB285

Public social services.

CA SB609

CalFresh.