Connecticut Senate Bill SJ00027

Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/7/19
• Refer: 3/7/19
• Report Pass: 3/20/19
• Refer: 3/29/19
• Report Pass: 4/4/19

Caption

Resolution Proposing A State Constitutional Amendment Allowing For No-excuse Absentee Voting.

Impact

If the amendment were approved, it would significantly impact state laws related to voting. Currently, absentee voting is typically restricted to those who provide specific reasons for their inability to vote in person, such as being out of town or having health issues. By allowing voters to request absentee ballots without needing to justify their absence, the amendment would expand voter access and potentially increase overall voter turnout, thereby reinforcing democratic engagement within the state.

Summary

SJ00027 is a resolution proposing a state constitutional amendment that would allow for no-excuse absentee voting in elections. This amendment seeks to provide easier access to voting for all qualified voters in the state, enabling them to cast their ballots without needing to provide a specific reason for their absence from the polling place. The intent of this bill is to modernize voting practices and ensure greater participation in the electoral process, reflecting a growing trend towards more flexible voting options in various states across the U.S.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SJ00027 appears to be generally supportive among proponents of expanded voting rights, including various advocacy groups and some legislative members. They argue that the bill is a necessary step towards making elections more accessible and ensuring that all citizens have the opportunity to participate in democracy. However, there are concerns that some individuals or groups may oppose the bill, citing fears about potential abuse of absentee voting provisions and the integrity of the electoral process.

Contention

Notable points of contention include discussions on voter security and the potential for increased voter fraud, which some critics raise in opposition to no-excuse absentee voting. Proponents counter these concerns by emphasizing statistical evidence showing that absentee voting does not notably increase fraud and instead advocating for the importance of making voting accessible for all. This debate reflects broader national conversations about voting rights, access to the electoral process, and the balance between ensuring election integrity and facilitating participation.