Louisiana 2019 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB159

Introduced
3/26/19  
Introduced
3/26/19  
Refer
3/26/19  
Refer
3/26/19  
Refer
4/8/19  
Refer
4/8/19  
Report Pass
4/25/19  
Report Pass
4/25/19  
Engrossed
5/6/19  
Engrossed
5/6/19  
Refer
5/7/19  
Report Pass
5/20/19  
Report Pass
5/20/19  
Enrolled
5/29/19  
Enrolled
5/29/19  
Chaptered
6/4/19  
Chaptered
6/4/19  
Passed
6/4/19  

Caption

Provides relative to the forms of security banks may use to secure funds deposited by local governments

Impact

The enactment of HB 159 significantly modifies existing laws concerning how local governments can secure their deposits. The bill stipulates that local depositing authorities must accept specific forms of security, including certain letters of credit and recognized insurance coverage. This change aims to streamline the process for local governments, enhancing their ability to manage public funds with greater safety and accessibility to various financial instruments.

Summary

House Bill 159 addresses the requirements for security related to bank deposits made by local governments in Louisiana. The bill specifically outlines various forms of securities that local governmental entities can utilize to secure their funds deposited in banks, thus providing clearer guidelines for financial transactions involving public funds. Its primary objective is to enhance the financial security measures for local deposits and ensure that local governments have viable options for safeguarding public money.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 159 seems positively skewed among lawmakers, as indicated by its unanimous passage through the Senate with 37 votes in favor and none against. The bill's supporters emphasize its role in fortifying the financial security for local governments, suggesting a proactive approach to managing public funds and bolstering trust in the system. However, discussions also reflect underlying concerns regarding the implications of administering such securities effectively.

Contention

While the bill achieved unanimous support, there may be contention surrounding the application and administrative capabilities of these new security measures. Critics might argue the simplicity of the legislation belies complexities involved in implementing these securities effectively at varied local government levels. Some local governments may encounter challenges in understanding or adopting the new requirements swiftly, raising questions about the adequacy of training and resources to facilitate this transition.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.