California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1099

Introduced
2/17/17  
Introduced
2/17/17  
Refer
3/6/17  
Refer
3/6/17  
Report Pass
4/5/17  
Report Pass
4/5/17  
Refer
4/6/17  
Refer
4/6/17  
Report Pass
4/20/17  
Report Pass
4/20/17  
Refer
4/20/17  
Refer
4/20/17  
Refer
5/10/17  
Report Pass
5/26/17  
Report Pass
5/26/17  
Engrossed
5/31/17  
Engrossed
5/31/17  
Refer
6/1/17  
Refer
6/1/17  
Refer
6/14/17  

Caption

Compensation: gratuities.

Impact

The legislation aims to enhance protections for employees who depend on tips as a significant part of their income. By stipulating that gratuities must be paid to workers by the next regular payday following authorization, AB 1099 seeks to reduce the potential for wage theft and might promote fairness within industries that rely heavily on consumer tipping, such as hospitality and personal services. As a result, this could bolster employee morale and improve retention rates in these sectors.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1099, introduced by Assembly Member Gonzalez Fletcher, proposes amendments to the Labor Code specifically addressing the treatment of gratuities in employment. The bill mandates that employers, particularly in industries such as hotels, restaurants, and personal services, must ensure that gratuities paid via debit or credit card are forwarded to the employee within a specified timeframe. This initiative is aimed at safeguarding the rights of workers to receive their earned gratuities without delay, thus reinforcing their financial security.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1099 appears to be generally positive among advocates for labor rights, as it offers stronger protections for workers. Supporters assert that ensuring timely payment of gratuities reflects a growing recognition of the economic realities faced by tipped workers. However, some industry representatives may express concerns regarding the administrative burdens that such regulations may impose, potentially leading to opposition from certain employer groups.

Contention

Key points of contention related to this bill may center around the implications for businesses that operate with tight margins, particularly in the service industry. Critics may argue that additional regulatory requirements could result in increased operational costs and operational complexities, thereby impacting small businesses disproportionately. On the other hand, advocates for the bill maintain that the rights of workers must be prioritized to mitigate any potential exploitation occurring within industries heavily reliant on tipping.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB3143

Compensation: gratuities.

CA SB422

Unemployment compensation: motion picture industry: loan-out companies.

CA AB56

Victim’s compensation: emotional injuries.

CA SB765

Teachers: retired teachers: compensation limitation.

CA SB1474

Public utilities: intervenor compensation.

CA SB1205

Workers’ compensation: medical treatment.

CA AB1099

Goat herders: labor protections.

CA AB2335

Public employment: compensation and classification.

CA SB655

Victim compensation.

CA SB1061

Consumer debt: medical debt.

Similar Bills

CA AB286

Food delivery: purchase prices and tips.

CA AB3143

Compensation: gratuities.

CA SB1423

Worker classification.

CA SB1402

Labor contracting: customer liability.

CA SB1490

Food delivery platforms.

CA AB1003

Wage theft: grand theft.

CA AB578

Food delivery platforms: customer service.

CA AB1301

Labor Code: protections, obligations, and prohibitions: Legislature.