Connecticut House Bill HR00005

Connecticut 2020 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/18/20
• Report Pass: 2/18/20
• Passed: 2/26/20

Caption

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of Stephen Fuzesi, Jr., Of Greenwich To Be Appointed A Member Of The Freedom Of Information Commission.

Impact

The resolution is expected to uphold the public's right to access information held by government entities, reinforcing the principles of open governance and transparency that are foundational to democratic processes. By confirming the nomination, the commission can continue its vital role in managing and adjudicating issues related to freedom of information, which is essential for ensuring that governmental bodies remain accountable to the public. The implications of this resolution extend to the accessibility of public records, fostering an environment where citizens can engage more fully with their government.

Summary

House Resolution No. 5 seeks to confirm the nomination of Stephen Fuzesi, Jr., of Greenwich as a member of the Freedom of Information Commission. This resolution emphasizes the importance of transparency and accountability in government by ensuring that the commission, responsible for overseeing public access to information, is staffed with qualified individuals. Stephen Fuzesi, Jr. has been nominated by the Governor and is expected to serve a term ending on June 30, 2023, unless a successor is appointed earlier. His confirmation is seen as a crucial step to maintaining the commission's function and effectiveness.

Contention

No significant points of contention were reported during the discussions surrounding this resolution, indicating a consensus among the members regarding the importance of the Freedom of Information Commission and the qualifications of the nominee. The unanimous vote of 8 yeas with no nays reflects a straightforward support for the resolution, illustrating that the nomination was seen as non-controversial and beneficial for public transparency. However, as with any appointment, the continual need for vigilance regarding the commission's operations and its role in safeguarding public information remains a key matter for long-term assessment.