Louisiana House Bill HB420

Louisiana 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/19
• Refer: 3/29/19
• Refer: 4/8/19

Caption

Authorizes the governing authority of the city of New Orleans to levy an additional hotel occupancy tax (OR +$7,100,000 LF RV See Note)

Impact

The bill requires the city to create a distinct Infrastructure Maintenance Fund to which the proceeds from the newly levied tax will be allocated. The governing authority of New Orleans is expected to prioritize how these funds are used to enhance and maintain infrastructure, thereby directly impacting local services and facilities. It also mandates that the mayor make information about the fund available to the public and submit an annual report detailing the allocation and use of these funds, ensuring transparency in financial matters related to the tax proceeds.

Summary

House Bill 420 authorizes the governing authority of the city of New Orleans to levy an additional hotel occupancy tax of up to 0.55% on the rent charged for hotel accommodations, pending voter approval. This proposed tax is designed to supplement existing revenues that fund various municipal activities and enhance infrastructure within the city. The ability to impose this tax reflects an effort to generate additional local funding to address the city's specific needs, particularly in the realm of infrastructure maintenance.

Sentiment

The sentiment towards HB 420 appears to be generally supportive among local government officials who see it as a necessary tool for funding vital city services and projects. However, there may be concerns from hotel operators and residents regarding the potential impact of an increased tax on tourism and local businesses. The requirement for voter approval may lead to a broader debate about the appropriateness of additional taxes and the perceived effectiveness of local governance in managing the funds raised through this tax.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the implications of adding an additional tax in a city where tourism plays a significant economic role. Some stakeholders may argue against the tax, fearing that it could deter visitors or place a financial burden on local hotels, potentially leading to negative consequences for the hospitality industry. Additionally, discussions around the efficacy of using these funds for infrastructure versus other immediate needs may arise, reflecting a broader dialogue about budget priorities and the role of local taxation.