California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1463

Introduced
2/17/17  
Introduced
2/17/17  
Refer
3/13/17  
Refer
3/13/17  
Report Pass
4/20/17  
Report Pass
4/20/17  
Refer
4/24/17  
Refer
4/24/17  
Report Pass
4/25/17  
Report Pass
4/25/17  
Refer
4/25/17  
Refer
4/25/17  
Refer
5/17/17  
Refer
5/17/17  
Failed
2/1/18  

Caption

Election of judges: working group.

Impact

The bill impacts several aspects of state laws, particularly around the judicial election process. The establishment of the working group under the Judicial Council is intended to create a structured approach to gather crucial information about judicial candidates and promote transparency. Furthermore, the repeal of existing restrictions on the Judicial Council's ability to fund the Court Case Management System without legislative consent grants more discretion in managing court resources effectively. This could lead to improvements in how judicial elections and court operations are communicated to the public.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1463, introduced by Assembly Member Levine, seeks to enhance voter education regarding judicial elections in California. Specifically, the bill establishes a working group tasked with determining the most effective means of informing voters about judicial candidates and making relevant information accessible. This initiative aims to help voters make informed decisions on candidates who play a vital role in the judiciary, thereby fostering greater civic engagement and awareness around judicial elections.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding AB 1463 appears to be positive, with supporters advocating for enhanced voter education as a critical step for improving the integrity and accessibility of the judicial election process. Many view this initiative as necessary for addressing knowledge gaps that exist among voters regarding judicial candidates. However, while the bill has gained traction, some members may express concerns regarding the funding mechanisms and administrative efficiency related to the formation of the working group.

Contention

One notable point of contention includes the potential administrative burden on the Judicial Council as it undertakes this initiative to improve voter education. Questions may arise regarding how effectively the working group will operate and whether the proposed changes will result in meaningful improvements in voter knowledge. Additionally, the bill must navigate the complexities of funding and ensuring adequate resources are available for the development and dissemination of educational materials, which could impact its overall effectiveness.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB1119

Enforcement of judgments.

CA AB221

Budget Act of 2023.

CA SB72

Budget Act of 2023.

CA AB1812

Budget Act of 2024.

CA SB917

Budget Act of 2024.

CA AB101

Budget Act of 2023.

CA SB101

Budget Act of 2023.

CA SB107

Budget Act of 2024.

CA AB107

Budget Act of 2024.

CA SB109

Budget Act of 2023.

Similar Bills

CA SB326

The Behavioral Health Services Act.

CA AB3042

County penalties.

CA AB1659

Large electrical corporations: wildfire mitigation: securitization.

CA AB136

Courts.

CA SB136

Courts.

CA SB523

Medi-Cal: emergency medical transport providers: quality assurance fee.

CA SB1441

Examination of petitions: time limitations and reimbursement of costs.

CA AB1329

Workers’ Compensation: Subsequent injuries payments.