Designates Monday, May 6, 2019, as Louisiana CPA Day at the state capitol.
Impact
The designation of Louisiana CPA Day aims to improve public awareness of the role that CPAs play in maintaining financial integrity and literacy within the state. The resolution also acknowledges the efforts of the LCPA to advocate for its members and to provide them with necessary resources and support in their professional endeavors. By officially recognizing this day, the state legislature hopes to foster a greater appreciation for the accounting profession among the public and government entities alike.
Summary
Senate Resolution No. 112, introduced by Senator Peacock, designates May 6, 2019, as Louisiana CPA Day at the state capitol. The resolution highlights the importance of Certified Public Accountants (CPAs) in the state, emphasizing their contributions across various sectors including public practice, industry, government, and education. This recognition serves to honor nearly six thousand CPAs who are members of the Society of Louisiana Certified Public Accountants (LCPA), which has a mission to enhance the profession and serve their members' common needs.
Sentiment
The sentiment around SR112 is generally positive, as it reflects a recognition of the valuable contributions made by CPAs to the state’s economy and governance. This type of resolution is typically supported by legislators, and it creates an opportunity for the accounting community to engage with lawmakers and the public to discuss their profession's importance. There is a celebratory aspect to such designations, underscoring unity and reflection on the significance of financial professions.
Contention
As a resolution, SR112 is unlikely to face major contention, as it primarily serves a ceremonial purpose without the implications of changing existing laws or regulations. Nonetheless, discussions around similar recognitions may sometimes include debates about the visibility of various professions and the advocacy needed for those not in the spotlight. However, in this case, no contentious points were noted in the discussions or voting history associated with the resolution.