The amendments outlined in AR27 are expected to enhance the efficiency of legislative sessions by clarifying the process for addressing rule violations. With this initiative, the decision of the Speaker on whether a member is in order is solidified, allowing for a quicker resolution to disruptions. Furthermore, the bill stipulates that the Speaker can only remove a member from the Assembly Chamber following a two-thirds vote of the Assembly members, which preserves a level of checks and balances in disciplinary actions against conduct deemed inappropriate.
Summary
Assembly Resolution No. 27 (AR27), introduced by Assembly Member Gray, seeks to amend Assembly Rule 114 concerning the procedure for calling a member to order for transgressing the rules. The proposed changes designate the Speaker of the Assembly as the authority to respond to such transgressions, empowering them to call a member to order immediately. This rule emphasizes a streamlined approach to managing order during legislative sessions, reinforcing the role of the Speaker in maintaining decorum and adherence to established protocols.
Contention
While the bill aims to improve operational efficiency within the Assembly, there may be concerns regarding the potential for misuse of authority by the Speaker. Critics might argue that the new rule could lead to an excessively centralized power structure, where the Speaker's discretion could overshadow the voices of members. The provision allowing language used in debate to go unpunished unless exceptions are raised in a timely manner is intended to protect freedom of speech within legislative debates, which can prompt discussions on balancing accountability and expression during sessions.