The measure's declaration of September as Student Hunger Action Month is intended to draw public attention and encourage actions aimed at combating food insecurity among students. It is a call to support initiatives and programs that would provide relief to students facing hunger, such as leveraging state benefits like the CalFresh program. This resolution emphasizes that without additional support, food insecurity and homelessness can significantly hinder students’ ability to complete their education and attain their degrees, thus impacting future employability and economic stability.
Summary
Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 116 (ACR 116) recognizes September 2017 as Student Hunger Action Month in California. The resolution aims to raise awareness of food insecurity and homelessness among students in higher education institutions such as the University of California (UC), California State University (CSU), and California Community Colleges (CCC). The resolution highlights the challenges students face, such as skipping meals or working multiple jobs to afford tuition and living expenses, which adversely affect their academic performance and engagement. Furthermore, it underscores the necessity for institutional support to address these issues.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding ACR 116 reflects a growing concern for student welfare and the social responsibility of institutions of higher learning. Many legislators and advocacy groups view the resolution positively, seeing it as a necessary recognition of the challenges many students face today. By designating a month to publicize these issues, supporters believe it may galvanize further support from the state and local communities to address food insecurity and promote well-being among the student population.
Contention
While ACR 116 does not introduce legislation per se, it draws attention to existing issues of food insecurity and homelessness that require robust solutions. This includes possible contention around funding for programs aimed at reducing student hunger and the effectiveness of current initiatives already in place within the UC, CSU, and CCC systems. Stakeholders may debate the adequacy of state responses and the necessity for additional resources to adequately support students in need.