Louisiana Senate Bill SB23

Louisiana 2020 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/28/20
• Refer: 1/28/20
• Refer: 3/9/20

Caption

Provides for activities of certain entities or organizations involved in extracurricular student athletic activities which receive more than fifty percent of funding from public schools. (8/1/20)

Impact

The impact of SB 23 is significant as it enforces stricter regulations on organizations funded through public schools to ensure they maintain transparency in their financial dealings. The requirement for these organizations to submit annual reports detailing student participation in athletic activities will allow the state to monitor funding effectiveness and accountability. It has the potential to change how schools and supporting organizations relate to and communicate with the state regarding athletic programs involving students.

Summary

Senate Bill 23, introduced by Senator Peacock, primarily addresses the funding and operational oversight of extracurricular student athletic activities within public schools. The bill amends existing laws to clarify the role of the legislative auditor regarding entities that receive financial assistance from public schools, particularly those organizations that support extracurricular athletics. It specifies that any organization receiving more than 50% of its income from a public school must adhere to new reporting requirements, aimed at enhancing transparency and accountability in the utilization of public funds for these activities.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding SB 23 appears to be supportive among proponents who advocate for improved oversight and accountability of public funds. However, there may be concerns raised by organizations that fear this additional red tape could complicate their operations or limit their funding. This sentiment reflects a balancing act between ensuring accountability and not imposing excessive restrictions that could hinder athletic programs in schools.

Contention

Notable points of contention include potential resistance from organizations that rely on public school funding for extracurricular activities. Critics might argue that stringent reporting requirements could deter participation or add administrative burdens that divert resources from athletic programming. The bill's implementation may evoke discussions about the proper role of government oversight versus the independence of organizations supporting school athletics.