Provides relative to interment of military servicemen and women. (gov sig)
Impact
The ramifications of SB 37 enhance the legal framework surrounding the interment of military personnel by establishing the PADD's authority, thus ensuring that the wishes of service members in life are recognized and honored in death. The law alters existing protocols for permissions regarding the movement of remains, which previously required consent from a defined hierarchy of relatives. By empowering the PADD, the bill reduces potential delays and disputes over the interment process, thereby facilitating a more respectful and timely handling of military remains.
Summary
Senate Bill 37, known as 'The United States Air Force Airman First Class Eugene Joseph Sonnier, III Act,' aims to clarify and extend the rights associated with the interment of deceased military service members. The bill introduces provisions that grant the Person Authorized to Direct Disposition (PADD), as indicated on the Department of Defense's DD Form 93, the authority to control the interment process, including moving the remains of the deceased. This modification acknowledges the unique needs pertaining to military personnel's burial rights and seeks to streamline interment processes in accordance with their documentation.
Sentiment
Overall, there appears to be a supportive view towards SB 37 among legislators, as it effectively memorializes the service and sacrifices of military members like Airman Sonnier. The changes proposed in the bill are considered a necessary step in acknowledging the complexities involved in military burials and reinforcing respect for the choices made by active service members regarding their remains. There might be minimal concern surrounding the responsibility imparted onto the PADD, but it is largely overshadowed by the overall acceptance of the bill's intent.
Contention
One notable point of consideration revolves around the potential implications for traditional family consent practices in the burial process. While the bill promotes efficiency, opponents may argue that it limits the rights of surviving relatives who may have differing views on the disinterment or interment practices. The necessity for a final court judgment in scenarios lacking consent is also maintained, suggesting a balance between streamlining authority and safeguarding family involvement in burial decisions. This dual approach reflects the delicate nature of interment practices within military and civilian contexts alike.
Allows for operation of crematories at locations not situated on cemetery grounds or funeral homes properties; provides for issuance of permits for certain crematories.
Allows for operation of crematories at locations not situated on cemetery grounds or funeral homes properties; provides for issuance of permits for certain crematories.