Provides relative to the use of court costs and fees for services by constables and marshals (EN SEE FISC NOTE LF RV See Note)
Impact
The passage of HB 116 will modify the legal framework governing the fees applicable to civil actions undertaken by marshals in specific cities. With these changes, the revenue generated from the fees will directly enhance the capabilities of these law enforcement officials by funding their training and equipment. This legislative move reflects an effort to not only standardize fees across various jurisdictions but also to ensure that marshals have the proper resources to perform their duties, potentially leading to improved public safety and service efficiency.
Summary
House Bill 116 aims to amend the existing laws surrounding the fees charged by city marshals and constables, specifically targeting the fees applicable to the marshal of Natchitoches. The bill sets out to establish a new tier of fees for civil services rendered by the marshals, allowing them to charge between ten to thirty dollars for each service. The funds collected will be directed towards a training and equipment fund that supports the necessary expenditures related to officer training and equipment updates, ensuring that officers are well-equipped to perform their duties effectively.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB 116 appears to be generally positive, as it seeks to enhance the operational effectiveness of city marshals while also addressing the financial aspects of their duties. However, there may be underlying apprehensions regarding the implementation of new fees and whether they will be met with resistance from the public or impact access to justice. The bill was passed unanimously in the Senate, indicating broad legislative support and favor, which suggests a unified belief in its potential benefits.
Contention
Notable points of contention may arise regarding the new fee structures and the potential for increased costs to citizens seeking services from marshals. Critics may question whether such fees could be burdensome or lead to inequitable access to justice for lower-income individuals. Furthermore, the requirement for Judicial Council approval before fees can be collected ensures a level of oversight; however, discussions about the appropriateness and adequacy of the fee amounts could generate debate among stakeholders including legal professionals and the community.
Provides for the jurisdictional limitation of certain city courts and the authority of constables of the First and Second City Court of New Orleans and their deputies and provides for judicial building fund for the Civil District Court for the parish of Orleans. (gov sig) (EN SEE FISC NOTE LF)