Louisiana Senate Bill SB76

Louisiana 2020 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/20/20
• Refer: 2/20/20
• Refer: 3/9/20

Caption

Provides relative to the funding formula and appropriations for postsecondary educational institutions. (gov sig)

Impact

If passed, SB 76 would affect existing regulations concerning how funds are appropriated to postsecondary institutions. By ensuring that institutions are not penalized for non-compliance with admission standards, the bill could encourage more diverse student enrollment and support institutions facing challenges in meeting specific admissions metrics. This could lead to a more inclusive approach to education funding, allowing institutions to focus on providing quality education rather than adhering strictly to certain admission criteria.

Summary

Senate Bill 76 aims to update the funding formula for postsecondary educational institutions in Louisiana. It mandates that the Board of Regents create an equitable distribution formula for funds allocated to institutions before submitting budget recommendations to the governor and the legislature. Additionally, it specifies that the funding formula shall not impose penalties on institutions or management boards for not fully complying with admission standards set by the Board of Regents. This approach is intended to enhance the financial stability of educational institutions and promote higher education accessibility.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB 76 appears to be supportive among educational stakeholders, as it addresses critical aspects of funding and compliance in the postsecondary education sphere. Advocates argue that the bill aligns with efforts to adapt to the evolving needs of students and institutions. However, there may be concerns regarding the implications of not enforcing strict admission standards and how this could influence the overall quality of education.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise over the permanence of state control over funding and admission standards. Critics could argue that the lack of penalties for non-compliance might lead to complacency among institutions regarding admissions policies. The balance between flexibility in funding and maintaining educational standards will likely be a focus of debate among policymakers and educational leaders, as they weigh the benefits of inclusivity against the potential risks to academic rigor.