Marriage and family therapists: clinical social workers: professional clinical counselors.
Impact
The changes brought about by AB 2117 significantly affect the procedures associated with licensure and registration in the healing arts field. Notably, the bill restricts the renewal of registrations beyond six years and makes it mandatory for applicants to have completed California law and ethics coursework prior to their registration as an associate clinical social worker. These amendments are designed to ensure that practitioners are well-versed in state-specific requirements and ethical considerations, thereby enhancing the quality of care provided by licensed professionals.
Summary
Assembly Bill 2117, authored by Arambula, amends several sections of the Business and Professions Code concerning the licensure and regulation of marriage and family therapists, clinical social workers, and professional clinical counselors in California. The bill aims to streamline the process for these professionals by allowing the renewal of expired registrations under specific terms similar to unexpired registrations. It also establishes annual participation in a state law and ethics examination for associate clinical social workers until they successfully pass the test, emphasizing the importance of continual education and accountability in the field.
Sentiment
The sentiment around AB 2117 appears to be generally supportive, particularly among regulatory bodies that advocate for heightened professional standards in the mental health field. However, there are concerns regarding the potential challenges posed by the stringent requirements, such as the mandatory yearly examination for associates, which some may view as a barrier to entry for new professionals in the field. The dialogue surrounding the bill reflects a balance between ensuring public safety and access to mental health services.
Contention
One of the key points of contention in the discussions surrounding AB 2117 involves the implications of requiring annual testing for associate clinical social workers. Proponents argue that this measure will maintain high professional standards and keep practitioners updated on relevant laws and ethical guidelines. Conversely, critics express concern that this requirement may disproportionately affect new professionals entering the field, potentially creating barriers and reducing the workforce available to address mental health needs in California. Furthermore, the interaction with other proposed legislation, such as SB 1491 and AB 93, adds another layer of complexity that has been a topic of discussion among legislators.