Connecticut 2021 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00658

Introduced
1/28/21  
Refer
1/28/21  
Refer
3/24/21  
Refer
3/24/21  
Report Pass
3/25/21  
Report Pass
3/25/21  
Refer
4/8/21  
Refer
4/8/21  
Report Pass
4/14/21  
Report Pass
4/14/21  
Refer
4/28/21  
Refer
4/28/21  
Report Pass
5/3/21  
Report Pass
5/4/21  
Report Pass
5/4/21  
Engrossed
5/25/21  
Report Pass
5/27/21  
Report Pass
5/27/21  
Passed
6/9/21  
Passed
6/9/21  
Chaptered
6/28/21  
Chaptered
6/28/21  
Enrolled
6/30/21  

Caption

An Act Requiring Employers To Recall Certain Laid-off Workers In Order Of Seniority.

Impact

If enacted, SB00658 will have a significant impact on labor laws in the state by formalizing the process for rehiring laid-off workers in specific industries. Employers will be required to document the reasons for layoffs and provide written notice to employees when hiring decisions are made. The bill will also not only help workers who were laid off but will also obligate companies to be transparent about their hiring practices moving forward. This could shift thresholds for employers who previously operated without such strict rehiring obligations.

Summary

Substitute Senate Bill No. 658, also known as the Act Requiring Employers to Recall Certain Laid-off Workers in Order of Seniority, aims to facilitate the rehiring of employees who were laid off due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The bill mandates that employers notify laid-off employees of job openings and prioritize rehiring based on their length of service, ensuring that those who were with the company the longest are given first consideration when positions become available. This legislation essentially seeks to protect employees' rights during a time when many were displaced from their jobs due to circumstances beyond their control.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be mixed. Proponents argue that it offers necessary protections for workers who have faced unjust layoffs during the pandemic, preserving their rights and providing them with a clear pathway back to employment. However, opponents may view the mandates as an undue burden on businesses that could reduce flexibility in managing their workforce. Ultimately, the bill is viewed as a response to the hardships inflicted by the pandemic, and sentiments reflect both the urgency of addressing job loss and the need for employer flexibility.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns from business owners about the practical implications of defining laid-off employees and the associated administrative overhead of complying with the bill's requirements. Some argue that the emphasis on seniority could conflict with the ability of employers to hire the best-suited candidates, regardless of how long they have been with the company. The discussions around this bill reflect a broader tension between employee protections and employer autonomy in workforce management during uncertain economic conditions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT HB05259

An Act Concerning Certain Court Orders Pertaining To Child Custody.

CT HB05325

An Act Concerning Compensation Paid To Injured Employees Under The Workers' Compensation Act.

CT HB05389

An Act Requiring State Employees In Human Service Roles To Work On-site.

CT HB05386

An Act Requiring Notice Of An Objection, Discontinuance Or Reduction Of Prescription Medication Under A Workers' Compensation Claim.

CT HB05448

An Act Concerning Security Of Certain Election Workers.

CT HB05156

An Act Requiring Notices Of Rent Increases.

CT SB00332

An Act Concerning Portal To Portal Coverage For Public Works Department Employees.

CT HB05197

An Act Concerning Social Workers.

CT SB00412

An Act Concerning The Protection Of Warehouse Workers In The State.

CT SB00334

An Act Requiring Pensions For Police Officers And Firefighters Employed By Municipalities.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.