California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2685

Introduced
2/15/18  
Refer
3/19/18  
Refer
3/19/18  
Report Pass
3/19/18  
Report Pass
3/19/18  
Refer
3/20/18  
Refer
3/20/18  
Report Pass
4/10/18  
Refer
4/10/18  
Refer
4/10/18  
Report Pass
4/12/18  
Report Pass
4/12/18  
Refer
4/16/18  
Refer
4/16/18  
Report Pass
4/24/18  
Refer
4/24/18  
Refer
4/24/18  
Report Pass
5/9/18  
Report Pass
5/9/18  
Engrossed
5/17/18  
Engrossed
5/17/18  
Refer
5/17/18  
Refer
5/17/18  
Refer
5/30/18  
Refer
5/30/18  
Report Pass
6/20/18  
Report Pass
6/20/18  
Refer
6/20/18  
Refer
6/20/18  
Enrolled
8/29/18  
Enrolled
8/29/18  
Chaptered
9/23/18  

Caption

Driving privilege: minors.

Impact

The repeal of Section 13202.7 means that minors who fall into the specified categories will no longer face automatic suspensions of their driving privileges by juvenile courts. Existing court orders to suspend or restrict driving privileges issued before January 1, 2019, will still remain in effect, providing a certain level of continuity for those affected before the repeal. The legislative action reflects a broader consideration of the implications of such suspensions on minors, especially regarding personal and family hardships that necessitate having a driver's license for various employment and medical reasons.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2685, introduced by Lackey, focuses on the driving privileges of minors, specifically addressing procedures related to the suspension or delay of these privileges by juvenile courts. The bill seeks to repeal Section 13202.7 of the Vehicle Code, which currently allows courts to suspend or delay issuance of driving privileges for a year for minors who are habitual truants or adjudged wards of the court. This repeal indicates a significant shift in how the law approaches the driving rights of minors under such circumstances.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment towards AB 2685 appears to be supportive among proponents who argue it reflects a more lenient and understanding approach towards minors facing the challenges associated with truancy or court adjudications. However, there are concerns regarding the potential downsides of removing such judicial authority, as some believe that the ability to restrict driving privileges is a necessary tool for managing minors' behaviors effectively. The debate surrounding the bill highlights a tension between leniency and accountability in juvenile law.

Contention

The main contention surrounding AB 2685 revolves around the balance between promoting independence for minors while ensuring community standards and accountability are not undermined. Critics of the repeal may argue that it removes a necessary deterrent for habitual truancy, while supporters stress the importance of allowing minors to retain access to driving privileges to assist with their personal circumstances, such as employment opportunities or medical needs. This discussion indicates differing philosophies regarding juvenile justice and the best methods to guide young individuals towards responsible behavior.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ A2666

Eliminates $375 minimum Corporation Business Tax on New Jersey S corporations with New Jersey gross receipts of less than $100,000.

CA SB237

Electricity: direct transactions.

CA AB2301

Alcoholic beverage sales: beer manufacturers: licensed premises.

CA AB1290

Lawyer-client privilege: holder of the privilege.

CA AB1427

Public utility franchises.

CA AB3188

Public utility franchises.

CA AB2842

Public utility franchises.

CA AB1618

Plea bargaining: benefits of later enactments.