Density bonuses: density bonus application.
By enhancing the density bonus application requirements, AB 2753 imposes additional duties on local planning officials, thereby establishing a state-mandated local program. Importantly, the legislation asserts that implementing uniform procedures for density bonus applications is a matter of statewide concern rather than a local affair, making it applicable to all cities, including charter cities. Moreover, the bill specifies that there will be no reimbursement required for local governments under this act as they have the authority to levy fees to cover related costs.
Assembly Bill No. 2753, introduced by Friedman, amends Section 65915 of the Government Code, specifically addressing the state's Density Bonus Law. This law requires local governments to grant density bonuses and incentives to developers who agree to include affordable housing units in their projects. The bill stipulates that local authorities must provide developers with a clear determination of the density bonus they may receive and any associated parking requirements when their application is deemed complete. This aims to streamline the approval process for affordable housing developments.
Overall, the sentiment surrounding AB 2753 appears to be positive, particularly among advocates for affordable housing who view the bill as a necessary step to facilitate housing production in a state grappling with a housing crisis. Supporters argue that the bill will help ease the regulatory burdens on developers, thus encouraging more construction of affordable housing. However, the implementation may raise concerns among local jurisdictions about the additional requirements placed on them without state funding for compliance.
Some points of contention may arise regarding the balance of power between state mandates and local governance. Opponents could argue that while increasing density bonuses may benefit housing availability, it might also diminish local control over land use decisions. Local officials may feel that their autonomy to shape development according to community interests could be compromised under the provisions of AB 2753. This bill may lead to debates on how best to manage housing needs while still respecting local governance.