Louisiana House Bill HCR48

Louisiana 2020 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/4/20
• Refer: 5/7/20
• Report Pass: 5/13/20
• Engrossed: 5/19/20
• Refer: 5/20/20
• Report Pass: 5/27/20
• Passed: 5/29/20

Caption

Requests the House and Senate governmental affairs committees to meet and function as a joint committee to review the process of rulemaking by state agencies and the Louisiana Administrative Code and make recommendations relative thereto

Impact

If pursued, HCR48 could lead to significant revisions in how state agencies create and enforce regulations. By urging a review of existing rules, the resolution aims to align state regulations with legislative intent and current legal standards, potentially simplifying compliance for stakeholders and improving the overall regulatory environment within the state. Legislative efforts in this area may also promote a culture of ongoing assessment and adaptability in state governance.

Summary

House Concurrent Resolution 48 (HCR48) calls for the creation of a joint committee by the House and Senate governmental affairs committees to review the process of rulemaking by state agencies and the Louisiana Administrative Code. This resolution emphasizes the importance of ensuring that rules and regulations are necessary and not overly burdensome for Louisiana citizens and businesses, underlining the need for systematic review to maintain effective governmental operation and accountability.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR48 appears to be generally positive, with support coming from various stakeholders, including business associations and legislative leaders. Advocates for the bill recognize the necessity of updating outdated regulations and minimizing bureaucratic inertia, seeing it as a proactive measure to boost governmental efficiency and responsiveness to public needs.

Contention

While there is an overall positive inclination towards HCR48, some points of contention may arise regarding the input process for stakeholders. The resolution proposes to solicit recommendations from a broad range of representatives, which could lead to differing opinions on which rules require modification or elimination. Furthermore, ensuring a balance between regulatory oversight and business interests may become a focal point of debate as the joint committee conducts its analyses.