Louisiana House Bill HB64

Louisiana 2020 1st Special Session

• Introduced: 6/10/20
• Refer: 6/10/20
• Report Pass: 6/11/20
• Engrossed: 6/17/20
• Refer: 6/18/20
• Report Pass: 6/22/20
• Enrolled: 6/25/20
• Chaptered: 7/13/20
• Passed: 7/13/20

Caption

Levies a state tax on the net revenue of fantasy sports contests (Item #17) (EN INCREASE SD RV See Note)

Impact

The implementation of HB 64 is expected to solidify regulations surrounding fantasy sports contests, potentially reducing any ambiguity in how these activities are taxed. By codifying this system of taxation, the bill aims not only to secure revenue but to ensure that operators of fantasy sports contests operate within a clear legal framework. The bill's framework for tax collection and revenue distribution is designed to support local educational initiatives, reflecting a point of policy alignment with community priorities.

Summary

House Bill 64 aims to establish a framework for the taxation of fantasy sports contests within Louisiana. The bill proposes an 8% tax on the net revenues generated from these contests, which will be collected by the state and directed towards specific funds, notably the Louisiana Early Childhood Education Fund. This legislation is positioned as a way to generate new revenue for state initiatives while recognizing the growing popularity and economic footprint of the fantasy sports industry in Louisiana.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 64 appears largely positive, especially among proponents who view it as an opportunity for economic growth and funding for early childhood education. Advocates argue that the bill will facilitate a burgeoning industry while concurrently serving the public good. Despite this, there may be dissent among taxpayers who express concerns regarding new taxes, indicating a nuanced view on the balance between public funding and fiscal responsibility.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise from debates on the regulation of fantasy sports as a form of gambling and the associated ethical considerations. Some critics might question whether the imposition of a tax could deter participants from engaging in these contests. Furthermore, discussions about the allocation of tax revenue could spur differing opinions regarding the best methods to support children's education compared to other public needs within the state.