Public postsecondary education: Plan Against College Hunger Act of 2018.
Impact
The enactment of SB 1275 would significantly alter state education financing by introducing a direct intervention against student hunger. By instituting financial awards specifically aimed at meal assistance, the bill recognizes the critical link between student health, well-being, and academic success. Furthermore, it stipulates that these awards shall not be counted as income when determining eligibility for other state or county-administered needs-based financial aids, thus ensuring that students do not face penalties for receiving this support.
Summary
Senate Bill 1275, known as the Plan Against College Hunger Act of 2018, aims to create a program that addresses food insecurity among students within California's public postsecondary educational institutions. The bill establishes the Plan Against College Hunger Program, which would be administered by the Student Aid Commission. Its primary objective is to provide financial assistance to eligible students by awarding funds equivalent to the cost of a meal plan that covers ten meals per week. This initiative is particularly targeted towards students enrolled at least half-time who qualify for Cal Grant B awards.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SB 1275 appears to be largely positive, with many stakeholders, including student advocacy groups, supporting the vital need to combat hunger on college campuses. Proponents highlight the importance of ensuring that all students have access to nutritious meals, which can improve their educational outcomes. However, there may also be concerns regarding the adequacy of funding for the program, given that its provisions are contingent on specific appropriations in the state budget.
Contention
A notable point of contention regarding SB 1275 is its reliance on the availability of appropriated funds. The bill specifies that its provisions will only take effect if state funds are allocated for this purpose in the annual Budget Act or another statute. This raises questions about the sustainability of the program, particularly in times of budget constraints, and whether sufficient financial resources will be secured to support its intended goals.