Provides relative to qualifications for Taylor Opportunity Program for Students scholarships. (gov sig) (Item #43)
Impact
The proposed alterations to the eligibility criteria are designed to support students from affected parishes, recognizing the disruptions caused by Hurricane Laura. Changes include waiving certain academic progress requirements and extending the time allowed for students to recover their awards if they were hindered from enrolling or completing their studies due to ongoing challenges. This legislation ambitiously aims to ensure that students can pursue their education without the added stress of stringent eligibility criteria that might otherwise prevent them from accessing vital scholarship funds.
Summary
Senate Bill 36 aims to modify the eligibility requirements for the Taylor Opportunity Program for Students (TOPS) scholarships in the aftermath of Hurricane Laura and due to the effects of COVID-19. The bill extends the deadline for taking the ACT for students graduating in 2020 from April to December 31, 2020. This extension is applicable specifically for students who were affected by the hurricane, allowing flexibility in their testing circumstances and the timeline for qualifying for financial assistance through the program. Moreover, it establishes that no student should face reduced eligibility solely due to these extraordinary circumstances.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SB 36 is generally positive, with lawmakers and educational advocates expressing support for measures that adapt to the needs of students in the wake of natural disasters. Many see this as a necessary step to mitigate educational and financial disruptions caused by unforeseen events. Discussion highlights a shared concern for the educational progression of students who may have already faced significant challenges, particularly in the wake of Hurricane Laura and the disruptions caused by the pandemic.
Contention
While the response to SB 36 has been largely favorable, there is an underlying concern about maintaining rigorous academic standards. Some critics may argue that waiving eligibility requirements could potentially lower academic expectations for students. The challenge lies in balancing the immediate need to support affected students while ensuring that the integrity of the scholarship program is preserved. The appropriateness of these adjustments in the context of maintaining educational standards may be discussed further among education policymakers and community stakeholders.
Prohibits healthcare entities from interfering with a patient's right to choose to obtain a clinician-administered drug from their provider or pharmacy of choice.