Prohibits employees of the House of Representatives from being reprimanded for suggesting that a person in their presence wear a protective face covering under certain circumstances
Impact
The implementation of HR7 is expected to have a direct impact on the operational environment within the House of Representatives. By protecting employees who advocate for safety measures like mask-wearing, the resolution establishes a framework that encourages health-conscious behavior without fear of professional repercussions. This measure reflects a legislative commitment to prioritizing health safety, particularly amidst crises such as pandemics, and sets a standard that could influence other legislative bodies in their approach to similar health concerns.
Summary
House Resolution 7 (HR7) was introduced during the 2020 Second Extraordinary Session and focuses on the protection of employees within the House of Representatives regarding public health emergencies. Specifically, it aims to prohibit any employee from facing reprimand or reprisal for requesting that individuals, including legislators, wear facial coverings when they are within six feet during work-related encounters. This legislation was notably inspired by concerns about the transmission of pathogens through respiratory droplets in the context of public health emergencies.
Sentiment
The overall sentiment surrounding HR7 appears to be supportive, primarily focusing on the health and safety of legislative employees. Proponents view the resolution as a necessary step to empower employees to advocate for their safety and that of their colleagues without the risk of penalty. However, opponents may question the necessity of such measures or their implications for workplace dynamics, though these sentiments are less documented in the available discussions.
Contention
While HR7 does not present major points of contention within the current narrative, it does raise discussions about the balance between individual freedoms and public health measures. Some may argue that while the intention is to foster a safe work environment, it could lead to social friction within the legislative chambers regarding adherence to health measures. Nonetheless, HR7 is primarily framed as a protective measure, aiming to safeguard employee wellbeing during health emergencies.
Request the governor to issue an executive order requiring certain persons to wear a face covering in public under certain conditions and authorizing businesses to deny admittance to persons without face coverings.
Requests the governor to issue an executive order requiring persons over age two to wear a mask or cloth face covering and authorizes business operators and building owners to deny admittance to individuals over age two who fail to wear a mask or cloth face covering.
Prohibits local, state and federal law enforcement officers from wearing any mask or personal disguise while interacting with the public in the performance of their duties; excludes certain protective masks.
Prohibits local, state and federal law enforcement officers from wearing any mask or personal disguise while interacting with the public in the performance of their duties; excludes certain protective masks.