Louisiana Senate Bill SB71

Louisiana 2020 2nd Special Session

• Introduced: 10/7/20
• Refer: 10/7/20
• Report Pass: 10/12/20
• Engrossed: 10/14/20
• Report Pass: 10/20/20
• Enrolled: 10/22/20
• Chaptered: 10/28/20
• Passed: 10/28/20

Caption

Provides for participation in certain meetings by teleconferencing or other electronic means for legislative bodies. (gov sig) (Item #25)

Impact

If enacted, SB71 will significantly alter the procedures for public bodies in Louisiana, enabling them to utilize teleconferencing or other electronic methods in situations defined by emergencies. The bill outlines specific conditions under which electronic meetings can occur. These include situations where meetings revolve around matters critical to the public body’s response to the disaster and are essential for public health or safety. This change is intended to promote ongoing governance and enhance public participation while honoring social distancing guidelines during emergencies.

Summary

Senate Bill 71, also known as the Act for Electronic Participation in Public Meetings, seeks to amend Louisiana's laws regarding public bodies' meetings during declared states of emergency or disaster. The primary focus of this bill is to allow public bodies to conduct meetings via electronic means when physical gatherings would be detrimental to public health, safety, or welfare. This flexibility aims to ensure that essential governmental functions can continue even in times of crisis, avoiding disruptions to public services and decision-making processes.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB71 appears to be positive, with unanimous support reflected in its voting history—passing the Senate with a vote of 34 to 0. Proponents of the bill argue that it is a necessary step towards modernizing public participation in governance, as it provides a contemporary solution to the challenges posed by emergencies such as natural disasters and health crises. The ability to conduct meetings electronically is seen as an enhancement to government transparency and accessibility.

Contention

While the bill has garnered broad support, some concerns have been raised regarding the transparency and effectiveness of electronic meetings compared to traditional in-person gatherings. Critics may argue that electronic participation could diminish the public’s ability to engage actively in governmental processes and express their views on critical issues. However, the bill incorporates specific measures to mitigate these risks, requiring public bodies to ensure compliance with set guidelines and to secure a two-thirds vote for considering matters not on the pre-approved agenda.