Connecticut Senate Bill SB00998

Connecticut 2021 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/4/21
• Refer: 3/4/21
• Report Pass: 3/18/21
• Refer: 3/29/21
• Report Pass: 4/6/21
• Engrossed: 5/12/21
• Report Pass: 5/14/21
• Passed: 6/2/21
• Chaptered: 6/7/21
• Enrolled: 6/8/21
• Passed: 6/14/21

Caption

An Act Concerning The Recommendations Of The Office Of Higher Education Regarding Private Occupational Schools And Closure Plans Of Institutions Of Higher Education.

Impact

The bill impacts state laws by mandating the submission of closure plans from independent institutions of higher education, detailing how they will respond to emergencies that disrupt operations, including natural disasters and pandemics. This pushes accountability for student records management and provides guidelines for ensuring students are able to continue their education or receive refunds. Additionally, schools are required to maintain financial records according to industry standards and submit annual financial statements, thus increasing transparency and stability within the sector.

Summary

Substitute Senate Bill No. 998, designated as Public Act No. 21-45, makes significant amendments to the regulations governing private occupational schools in Connecticut. The primary objective of the bill is to ensure financial protections for students attending these institutions and to create robust plans for handling school closures due to insolvency. Notably, it introduces a 'private occupational school student protection account' into the state budget, funded by a small percentage of the tuition collected by these schools. This account is intended to reimburse students who are unable to complete courses as a result of their school's closure, thereby safeguarding student investments in their education.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB00998 appears to be positive, particularly among proponents who assert that it effectively enhances protections for students. Supporters commend the initiative as a necessary response to past failures in safeguarding student investment, especially in light of the increasing number of school closures. However, some critics worry that the additional financial burdens and administrative requirements placed on private occupational schools may indirectly increase tuition costs or limit the availability of certain programs. These concerns highlight a tension between ensuring student protections and maintaining accessible educational opportunities.

Contention

Points of contention primarily revolve around the economic implications for private occupational schools and their operational freedoms. While the bill aims to protect students, opponents argue it may inadvertently hinder the growth and viability of smaller schools that struggle with compliance costs. Additionally, there are apprehensions about the scope of regulatory oversight that may come as a result of these changes. The bill's mandates could lead to a reduction in the number of institutions, which may limit choices for prospective students looking for specific training or education.