Provides relative to suspensions and expulsions of public school students
If enacted, HB 136 would represent a significant shift in Louisiana's approach to student discipline. The bill retains the existing rules governing students in grades nine through twelve, potentially limiting the students in lower grades from facing harsh penalties for minor infractions. This change aims to promote a more supportive educational environment and reduce the school-to-prison pipeline by ensuring that younger students are not disproportionately punished for minor behavior issues. Schools would need to adapt their disciplinary frameworks in accordance with these new provisions, requiring training and support for staff to identify trauma and communicate effectively with students and their families regarding disciplinary matters.
House Bill 136 aims to change the disciplinary procedures related to suspensions and expulsions in Louisiana public schools. It specifically targets students in grades pre-K through eight, establishing that they cannot be suspended or expelled for uniform violations that are not associated with willful misconduct. The bill emphasizes that suspensions should only be applied for serious offenses that cause significant harm to others, ensuring that lesser infractions do not lead to harsh disciplinary actions. Furthermore, it stipulates that before any suspension, using a CDC-developed trauma assessment tool is encouraged to determine if the student's behavior is linked to underlying trauma and whether alternative disciplinary actions may be more appropriate.
The sentiment around HB 136 is mixed but leans towards positive from advocates of student welfare and mental health. Supporters praise the bill for acknowledging the role of trauma in student behavior and for aiming to prevent disproportionate punishments for younger students, which can lead to devastating long-term consequences. On the other hand, some concerns arise from those who worry that it may constrain school officials' ability to maintain order and discipline, leading to potential safety issues within schools.
Notable points of contention revolve around the bill's specifics regarding the trauma assessment requirement and its application in disciplinary proceedings. Critics might argue that the assessment adds an extra layer of complexity to the disciplinary process, potentially delaying necessary actions in situations that require immediate response. Additionally, while the prohibition against suspending students for uniform violations may be seen as a protective measure for younger students, opponents might express concerns that this could undermine school authority and compromise student accountability, disrupting the learning environment.