Connecticut House Bill HJ00239

Connecticut 2021 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/19/21
• Refer: 3/19/21
• Report Pass: 4/8/21
• Refer: 4/19/21
• Report Pass: 4/26/21

Caption

Resolution Granting The Claims Commissioner An Extension Of Time To Dispose Of Certain Claims Pursuant To Title 4 Of The General Statutes.

Impact

If passed, this resolution would directly affect the handling of claims made against the state by extending deadlines that would otherwise expire. By granting more time for resolution, it enables the Claims Commissioner to conduct thorough reviews of claims, leading to potentially fairer outcomes for those seeking compensation or resolution with the state. This could improve the overall efficacy of the claims processing system, which has faced criticism for delays in addressing claims.

Summary

House Joint Resolution 239 seeks to provide the Claims Commissioner an extension of one year to dispose of specific claims against the state. The resolution addresses individual claims that have been delayed for various reasons, allowing for an extended timeframe to process these legal matters effectively. The provision aims to ensure that the claims are resolved in a timely manner without unnecessary pressure on the Claims Commissioner's office.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HJ00239 appears to be largely supportive among committee members, as indicated by the unanimous vote of 38 yeas and 0 nays during the voting session on April 8, 2021. This broad support suggests a consensus on the necessity of providing the Claims Commissioner with additional time to manage the claims workload. Stakeholders in the legal and governmental sectors may see this as a common-sense measure to enhance operational efficiency within the claims process.

Contention

While the resolution passed without opposition, it may still spark discussions regarding the implications of extended timelines in claims processing. Some may argue that extensions could potentially lead to delays in compensation for claimants, highlighting a tension between the need for thorough evaluation and the urgency of resolution for those waiting for claims to be settled. Overall, the debate may center around balancing operational capacity with expedient claims resolution.