Louisiana 2021 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB220

Introduced
3/25/21  
Refer
3/25/21  
Refer
4/12/21  
Report Pass
5/10/21  
Report Pass
5/10/21  
Engrossed
5/19/21  
Engrossed
5/19/21  
Refer
5/20/21  
Refer
5/20/21  
Report Pass
6/2/21  
Report Pass
6/2/21  
Enrolled
6/8/21  
Enrolled
6/8/21  
Chaptered
6/14/21  

Caption

Provides relative to public works contracts

Impact

The implementation of HB 220 will significantly affect state laws related to public contracts by setting clear timelines for awarding contracts and resolving disputes. By restricting the duration for suspensive appeals and requiring expedited trials, the bill emphasizes the importance of timely execution in public works projects. This may potentially improve the efficiency of public project delivery in Louisiana, allowing for faster infrastructure development and maintenance while adhering to established legal protocols.

Summary

House Bill 220 aims to streamline the process for awarding public works contracts in Louisiana. The legislation requires that a public entity must award a contract to the lowest responsible bidder within 45 days of bid opening, or reject all bids. Additionally, it outlines procedures to expedite legal actions concerning contract disputes, ensuring that interested parties receive a trial on injunctions or writs of mandamus within 30 days. If a judgment determining the lowest bidder is reached, the contract must be awarded within 45 days unless a suspensive appeal is filed by the public entity. This process aims to provide clarity and efficiency in public contracting operations.

Sentiment

General sentiment regarding the bill appears supportive among legislators who advocate for more efficient government processes. However, there may be concerns about the balance between expediency and thoroughness in addressing contract disputes. Opponents might argue that hastening the legal process could compromise the ability to contest awards effectively, leading to potential injustices for bidders who may be adversely affected by rushed decisions.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 220 include the implications of limiting suspensive appeals to only public entities and the pressure it puts on the judicial system to adhere to strict timelines. Critics might assert that such provisions could encourage hasty contract awards, which could overlook the complexities often inherent in public works projects. The bill’s potential to streamline the bidding process may also raise concerns among contractors about fairness and transparency in local government dealings.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.