Louisiana House Bill HB311

Louisiana 2021 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/30/21
• Refer: 3/30/21
• Refer: 4/12/21

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of consent judgment against the State in the suit captioned Linda D. Weaver, et vir vs. State of La., Dept. of Transportation and Development

Impact

The impact of HB 311 is primarily financial, as it ensures that the state upholds its legal responsibilities by appropriating the required funds to settle a judgment. This action reflects a commitment to meet legal obligations and demonstrates accountability in state governance. By meeting the terms of the court's decision, the bill aims to prevent any further legal repercussions that could arise from non-compliance with the ruling, which is crucial for maintaining public confidence in state operations and the judicial system.

Summary

House Bill 311 is focused on the appropriation of funds for the payment of a consent judgment related to a legal suit against the State of Louisiana, specifically the Department of Transportation and Development. The bill mandates the allocation of $75,000 from the State General Fund for the fiscal year 2020-2021 to satisfy the terms of the judgment in the case of 'Linda D. Weaver, et vir vs. State of Louisiana, Department of Transportation and Development'. This legislative measure serves as an official authorization required to disburse allocated funds for legal obligations incurred by the state. Furthermore, it outlines specific protocols for payment, including the necessary documentation that must be provided to the state treasurer prior to releasing the funds.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 311 appears to lean towards practical necessity rather than political controversy. As a bill focused solely on the appropriation of funds for a legal settlement, it seems to have garnered broad support as legislators recognize the importance of fulfilling the state’s financial obligations. Although the bill does not introduce broader policy changes, its straightforward purpose likely minimizes substantial contention among lawmakers, allowing it to progress with relative ease through the legislative process.

Contention

While there is no substantial contention noted in the discussions around HB 311, it is essential to highlight concerns regarding the dependency on state funds to cover legal settlements. Critics may argue that the state should seek to mitigate legal liabilities more effectively by enhancing compliance and preventing the need for such appropriations in the first place. Nonetheless, the specific nature of this bill, which merely adheres to an existing judgment, suggests that any debate is likely to be minimal and focused on ensuring prompt and lawful financial transactions rather than ideological differences.