California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB166

Introduced
1/7/19  
Refer
3/7/19  
Refer
3/7/19  
Report Pass
3/7/19  
Refer
3/11/19  
Refer
3/11/19  
Report Pass
4/29/19  
Report Pass
4/29/19  
Refer
5/1/19  
Refer
5/1/19  
Refer
5/8/19  
Refer
5/8/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Engrossed
5/22/19  
Refer
5/23/19  
Refer
5/23/19  
Refer
5/29/19  
Refer
5/29/19  
Report Pass
6/20/19  
Refer
6/24/19  
Refer
6/24/19  
Refer
8/12/19  
Refer
8/12/19  
Report Pass
8/30/19  
Report Pass
8/30/19  
Enrolled
9/11/19  
Vetoed
10/13/19  

Caption

Medi-Cal: violence preventive services.

Impact

AB 166 specifically targets individuals who have suffered violent injuries by offering services designed to reduce their chances of re-injury and involvement in retaliatory violence. The act highlights the need for a collaborative approach among community partners, healthcare professionals, and violence prevention specialists in delivering evidence-based and culturally responsive services. Furthermore, the bill includes provisions for training and certifying violence prevention professionals, which may enhance the quality of care provided to Medi-Cal beneficiaries.

Summary

Assembly Bill 166, introduced by Assembly Member Gabriel, aims to establish a violence intervention pilot program under the Medi-Cal system in California. The bill mandates the State Department of Health Care Services to create this program at a minimum of nine sites across specified counties. The intent is to provide preventive services to individuals who have been treated for violent injuries, thereby addressing the cycle of violence and promoting recovery through community-based interventions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 166 is generally positive among supporters who view it as a proactive step toward addressing violence in communities through health care solutions. However, there are concerns regarding its implementation and the effectiveness of the pilot program. Some legislators questioned the sustainability of funding and the necessity of federally approved measures that could potentially affect the rollout of the program.

Contention

While supporters of the bill argue that it can lead to decreased rates of violence and improved health outcomes, opponents raise questions about the adequacy of the infrastructure to support such services and the potential bureaucratic hurdles in coordinating between various entities involved. Additionally, there is concern over managing the resources effectively, especially in contexts where violence intervention intersects with broader public health issues.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB859

Juveniles: dependency: judicial caseloads.

CA AB893

22nd District Agricultural Association: firearm and ammunition sales at the Del Mar Fairgrounds.

CA AB524

Peace officers: deputy sheriffs.

CA AB891

Public property: safe parking program.

CA AB1747

California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System: immigration.

CA AB1331

Criminal justice data.

CA AB602

Depiction of individual using digital or electronic technology: sexually explicit material: cause of action.

CA AB1202

Privacy: data brokers.

Similar Bills

CA AB1929

Medi-Cal benefits: violence prevention services.

MI HB6046

Human services: medical services; coverage for community violence prevention services; provide for. Amends 1939 PA 280 (MCL 400.1 to 400.119b) by adding secs. 89 and 89a.

CA AB501

Mental health: community care facilities.

CA AB1688

Community health services: California Mental Health Planning Council, California Children’s Services program, Alameda County pilot program, and Medi-Cal managed care.

CA SB326

The Behavioral Health Services Act.

CA SB803

Mental health services: peer support specialist certification.