Louisiana Senate Bill SB220

Louisiana 2021 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/2/21
• Refer: 4/2/21
• Refer: 4/12/21
• Report Pass: 4/20/21
• Refer: 4/21/21
• Report Pass: 5/3/21
• Engrossed: 5/11/21
• Refer: 5/12/21
• Refer: 5/26/21
• Refer: 5/27/21
• Report Pass: 6/1/21
• Enrolled: 6/9/21
• Vetoed: 7/1/21

Caption

Provides relative to the legislative auditor examinations, audits, and reviews of elections and retention of election records. (See Act) (EN INCREASE GF EX See Note)

Impact

If enacted, SB 220 would amend existing laws to grant the legislative auditor expanded authority regarding election oversight. By establishing a structured approach to audits and requiring regular examinations of election processes, the bill is poised to improve the overall governance of elections. This shift could lead to more robust fraud prevention measures and better compliance with established election standards, which would aim to enhance voter confidence in electoral outcomes.

Summary

Senate Bill 220 focuses on the legislative auditor's role in overseeing and reviewing election processes in Louisiana. The bill aims to enhance the audit framework for elections by enabling the legislative auditor to conduct examinations and audits of local, state, and federal elections. Furthermore, it specifies the retention period for election records, thereby aiming to ensure transparency and accountability in the electoral process. The provisions aim to facilitate better oversight mechanisms that can bolster public trust in election integrity.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 220 appears to be generally positive among proponents, who argue that increased transparency and auditing of elections is crucial for public trust. Supporters emphasize that the legislative auditor's role can significantly help prevent election-related fraud and ensure the integrity of Louisiana's electoral system. However, there may be concerns from those who fear that such oversight could lead to governmental overreach or could complicate the electoral process unnecessarily.

Contention

While the intent of SB 220 aligns with promoting electoral integrity, some critics may question the feasibility and resource implications of implementing extensive audits across various electoral events. Additionally, debates might arise about the potential bureaucratic burden placed on local election officials and whether the increased scrutiny could possibly foster public cynicism rather than confidence, depending on how the audits are perceived and executed.