Appropriates funds for payment of the judgment against the state in the suit entitled Elaine Lewnau et al. v. The Board of Supervisors of Southern State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
Impact
The passage of HB 677 will have a direct impact on the state budget as it allocates funds to settle a legal obligation. This bill is significant as it illustrates the state's commitment to honoring court judgments and provides clarity on how payments will be handled, including stipulations that no interest will accrue after the bill's effective date. Moreover, the legislative move aims to allow a swifter resolution to legal disputes that involve public entities, thereby potentially reducing future liabilities.
Summary
House Bill 677 deals with appropriating funds for the payment of a judgment against the state regarding a legal case involving Southern State University. Specifically, the bill authorizes a total payment of $17,242, which includes a principal amount, attorney's fees, and court costs. The funds are to be drawn from the State General Fund for the fiscal year 2020-2021, and the bill outlines specific conditions under which the payment is to be executed, ensuring compliance with the judgment's provisions.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB 677 is largely procedural and practical, with less contentious debate compared to more politically charged legislation. It has garnered support as a responsible approach to fiscal management in relation to legal judgments against the state. There are no significant partisan divides noted in the discussions, indicating an understanding across party lines of the necessity to fulfill legal obligations.
Contention
While HB 677 does not seem to encounter significant opposition in terms of its contents, it illustrates broader themes of accountability and transparency within state expenditures. Concerns about the implications of state appropriations for legal judgments could emerge, particularly regarding the potential for increased legal exposure for the state in future cases. However, the focus remains on ensuring that taxpayers' money is used appropriately to settle court-ordered payments.
Appropriates funds for payment of the judgment against the state in the suit entitled Louise Kaltenbaugh, Ph.D. et al. v. Board of Supervisors, Southern University and Agricultural and Mechanical College at Baton Rouge c/w Dayanand Thangada et al. v Board of Supervisors, Southern University and Agricultural and Mechanical College at Baton Rouge
Appropriates funds for payment of judgment against the state in "Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College v. Michael P. Villavaso"
Appropriates funds for judgment against the state in the matter of "Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College v. 1732 Canal Street, LLC, et al"
Appropriates funds for judgments against the state related to expropriation of property in the matter of "Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College v. 1732 Canal Street, LLC, et al"
Appropriates funds for payment of the consent judgment against the state in the suit entitled Don Fontenelle v. Dash Building Material Center, Inc. et al.